4.4 Article

Efficient experimental design for dose response modelling

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS
Volume 48, Issue 13-15, Pages 2864-2888

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2021.1880556

Keywords

Bioassay; efficiency; goodness of fit; logistic regression; median lethal dose; relative potency; 62j02; 62j12; 62k05

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The logit binomial logistic dose response model is commonly used in applied research to model binary outcomes based on the dose or concentration of a substance, allowing for assessment of relative potency. Researchers in various fields must choose efficient experimental designs to fit dose response curves and gather important information regarding drug or substance potency.
The logit binomial logistic dose response model is commonly used in applied research to model binary outcomes as a function of the dose or concentration of a substance. This model is easily tailored to assess the relative potency of two substances. Consequently, in instances where two such dose response curves are parallel so one substance can be viewed as a dilution of the other, the degree of that dilution is captured in the relative potency model parameter. It is incumbent that experimental researchers working in fields including biomedicine, environmental science, toxicology and applied sciences choose efficient experimental designs to run their studies to both fit their dose response curves and to garner important information regarding drug or substance potency. This article provides far-reaching practical design strategies for dose response model fitting and estimation of relative potency using key illustrations. These results are subsequently extended here to handle situations where the assessment of parallelism and the proper dose-scale are also of interest. Conclusions and recommended strategies are supported by both theoretical and simulation results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available