Diagnosis of biofilm infections: current methods used, challenges and perspectives for the future

The diagnosis of biofilms continues to be a challenge, and there is no standardized protocol for such a diagnosis in clinical practice. In addition, some proposed methodologies are expensive to require significant amounts of time and a high number of trained staff, making them impracticable for clinical practice. In recent years, mass spectrophotometry/matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF) has been applied it in biofilm studies. However, due to several problems and limitations of the technique, MALDI-TOF is far from being the gold standard for identifying biofilm formation. The omics analysis may prove to be a promising strategy for the diagnosis of biofilms in clinical laboratories since it allows the identification of pathogens in less time than needed for conventional techniques and in a more specific manner. However, omic tools are expensive and require qualified technical expertise, and an analysis of the data obtained needs to be careful not to neglect subpopulations in the biofilm. More studies must therefore be developed for creating a protocol that guarantees rapid biofilm identification, ensuring greater chances of success in infection control. This review discusses the current methods of microbial biofilm detection and future perspectives for its diagnosis in clinical practice.

Automated summary

Diagnosing biofilms remains challenging, with no standardized protocol in clinical practice. Mass spectrophotometry/matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF) has shown promise, but omics analysis may be a more effective strategy for quicker and more specific identification of pathogens within biofilms. Further research is needed to develop a protocol that ensures rapid and successful biofilm identification.