4.7 Article

Wild and domestic savanna herbivores increase smaller vertebrate diversity, but less than additively

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages 953-963

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13843

Keywords

biodiversity conservation; cattle stocking rate; ecological restoration; elephant; grazing intensity; livestock– wildlife interactions; savanna ecosystems; spatio‐ temporal heterogeneity

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [03-16402, 08-16453, 12-56004, 12-56034, 19-31224, 97-07477]
  2. Smithsonian Institution
  3. National Geographic Society [4691-91, 9106-12]
  4. Rufford Foundation [27451-1]
  5. Priestly International Centre for Climate
  6. School of the Earth and Environment, University of Leeds
  7. University of Leeds Centre for Climate's Climate Research Bursary Award
  8. Leeds Doctoral Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study in Kenya found that cattle stocking rates can increase the diversity of smaller wildlife, though the presence of larger wild herbivores may lessen this effect. Sites accessible to mesoherbivores had higher diversity of smaller wildlife than sites excluding mesoherbivores when cattle were not present.
Cattle and other livestock graze more than a quarter of the world's terrestrial area and are widely regarded to be drivers of global biodiversity declines. Studies often compare the effects of livestock presence/absence but, to our knowledge, no studies have tested for interactive effects between large wild herbivores and livestock at varying stocking rates on small-bodied wild vertebrates. We investigated the effects of cattle stocking rates (none/moderate/high) on the diversity of wildlife 0.05-1,000 kg using camera traps at a long-term exclosure experiment within a semi-arid savanna ecosystem in central Kenya. In addition, by selectively excluding wild 'mesoherbivores' (50-1,000 kg) and 'megaherbivores' (>1,000 kg; elephant and giraffe), we tested whether the presence of these two wild herbivore guilds (collectively, 'larger wild herbivores') mediates the effect of cattle stocking rate on habitat use and diversity of 'smaller wildlife' (mammals ranging between 10 and 70 cm shoulder height and birds). Our results show that cattle enhance alpha diversity of smaller wildlife (with or without larger wild herbivore presence) and of all wildlife 0.05-1,000 kg (with or without megaherbivore presence), by altering vegetation structure. However, for smaller wildlife, this effect is less pronounced in the presence of larger wild herbivores, which also shorten grass. In the absence of cattle, mesoherbivore-accessible sites showed higher alpha diversity of smaller wildlife than sites excluding mesoherbivores. Smaller wildlife habitat use was increased by high cattle stocking rates and wild mesoherbivores more in the presence of the other. Synthesis and applications. Our findings imply that grazing, whether by livestock or wildlife, can enhance local savanna wildlife diversity. The biodiversity benefits of localised increases in herbivory are likely to be due to shortened grass and associated visibility improvements (for predator avoidance/foraging). This suggests that land managers can increase local biodiversity by shortening grass, with wild or domestic herbivores (or both), at least in patches within a taller grass matrix.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available