4.2 Article

Nutritional composition of Apis mellifera adansonii L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) from three ecological zones of Nigeria

Journal

JOURNAL OF APICULTURAL RESEARCH
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages 445-456

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00218839.2021.1874709

Keywords

honey bees; environment; ecozones; minerals; vitamins; secondary metabolites

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the nutritional and anti-nutritional composition of honey bees from different ecological zones in Nigeria. The results showed no significant differences in the nutritional components among the honey bees from the three ecological zones, but the level of phytate exceeded the regulatory safe level.
The honey bee is an important economic and domesticated insect. This insect has been gaining attention as a potential nutritional source in different parts of the world. This study therefore evaluated the nutritional and anti-nutritional composition of the tissue of honey bees, Apis mellifera adansonii, from the rainforest, guinea savannah and derived savannah zones of Nigeria. Honey bee samples were collected from fully colonised colonies of two different apiaries each from the rainforest, guinea and derived savannah zones of Nigeria for chemical analyses. Proximate, minerals composition, vitamin and secondary metabolites composition were estimated using standard methods. The levels of proximate compositions (fat, ash, crude fibre, crude protein and carbohydrate contents), minerals, vitamins and secondary metabolites recorded in the honey bees from the three ecological zones were not significantly different. Potassium, chloride and calcium respectively were higher in the honey bee tissue than the other minerals tested. However, the level of phytate was higher in the honey bee samples than the regulatory safe level. Based on the results of this study, honey bees from the studied ecological zones of Nigeria are equally nutritious.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available