4.7 Article

No difference in HIV-1 integrase inhibitor resistance between CSF and blood compartments

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 76, Issue 6, Pages 1553-1557

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkab064

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le Sida et les he'he sur le Sida et les he'patites virales-Maladies Infectieuses Emergentes (ANRSMIE).

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study revealed similar integrase inhibitor resistance profiles in the CNS and plasma among a population of HIV-1 viraemic patients, with the majority of patients infected with non-B subtypes.
Background: Little is known about HIV-1 integrase inhibitor resistance in the CNS. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate integrase inhibitor resistance in CSF, as a marker of the CNS, and compare it with the resistance in plasma. Methods: HIV integrase was sequenced both in plasma and CSF for 59 HIV-1 patients. The clinical and biological data were collected from clinical routine care. Results: Among the 59 HIV-1 patients, 32 (54.2%) were under antiretroviral (ARV) treatment. The median (IQR) HIV-1 RNA in the plasma of viraemic patients was 5.32 (3.85-5.80) and 3.59 (2.16-4.50) log(10) copies/mL versus 4.79 (3.56-5.25) and 3.80 (2.68-4.33) log10 copies/mL in the CSF of ARV-naive and ARV-treated patients, respectively. The patients were mainly infected with non-B subtypes (72.2%) with the most prevalent recombinant form being CRF02_AG (42.4%). The HIV-1 integrase sequences from CSF presented resistance mutations for 9/27 (33.3%) and 8/32 (25.0%) for ARV-naive (L74I, n = 3; L74I/M, n = 1; T97A, n = 1; E157Q, n = 4) and ARV-treated (L74I, n = 6; L74M, n = 1; T97A, n = 1; N155H, n = 1) patients, respectively. Integrase inhibitor resistance mutations in CSF were similar to those in plasma, except for 1/59 patients. Conclusions: This work shows similar integrase inhibitor resistance profiles in the CNS and plasma in a population of HIV-1 viraemic patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available