4.5 Article

Mild Behavioral Impairment and Subjective Cognitive Decline Predict Cognitive and Functional Decline

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
Volume 80, Issue 1, Pages 459-469

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-201184

Keywords

Mild behavioral impairment; mild cognitive impairment; neuropsychiatric symptoms; preclinical Alzheimer's disease; subjective cognitive decline

Categories

Funding

  1. NIA/NIH [U01 AG016976]
  2. NIA [P30 AG019610, P30 AG013846, P30 AG062428-01, P50 AG 008702, P50 AG025688, P50 AG047266, P30 AG010133, P50 AG005146, P30 AG062421-01, P30 AG062422-01, P50AG005138, P30 AG008051, P30 AG 013854, P30 AG008017, P30 AG010161]
  3. The NIA [P50 AG047366, P30 AG010129, P50 AG016573, P30 AG062429-01, P50 AG023501, P30 AG035982, P30 AG028383, P30 AG053760, P30 AG010124, P50 AG005133, P50 AG005142, P30 AG012300, P30 AG049638, P50 AG005136, P30 AG062715-01, P50 AG005681, P50 AG047270]
  4. Alzheimer Society of Calgary via the Hotchkiss Brain Institute
  5. Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research Education
  6. Ron and Rene Ward Centre for Healthy Brain Aging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that individuals with both MBI and SCD had the highest risk of cognitive and functional decline, suggesting that these two conditions combined can serve as a simple and scalable method to identify high-risk patients.
Background: Mild behavioral impairment (MBI) and subjective cognitive decline (SCD) are dementia risk states, and potentially represent neurobehavioral and neurocognitive manifestations, respectively, of early stage neurodegeneration. Both MBI and SCD predict incident cognitive decline and dementia, are associated with known dementia biomarkers, and are both represented in the NIA-AA research framework for AD in Stage 2 (preclinical disease). Objective: To assess the associations of MBI and SCD, alone and in combination, with incident cognitive and functional decline in a population of older adults. We tested the hypothesis that MBI and SCD confer additive risk for decline. Methods: Cognitively normal participants were followed up annually at Alzheimer's Disease Centers. Logistic regression assessed the relationship between baseline classification (MBI-SCD-, MBI-SCD +, MBI + SCD-, or MBI + SCD +) and 3-year outcome. Results: Of 2,769 participants (mean age = 76), 1,536 were MBI-SCD-, 254 MBI-SCD +, 743 MBI + SCD-, and 236 MBI + SCD +. At 3 years, 349 (12.6%) declined to CDR > 0, including 23.1% of the MBI + group, 23.5% of the SCD + group, and 30.9% of the intersection group of both MBI+and SCD + participants. Compared to SCD-MBI-, we observed an ordinal progression in risk (ORs [95% CI]): 3.61 [2.42-5.38] for MBI-SCD + (16.5% progression), 4.76 [3.57-6.34] for MBI+SCD-(20.7%), and 8.15 [5.71-11.64] for MBI + SCD+(30.9%). Conclusion: MBI and SCD together were associated with the greatest risk of decline. These complementary dementia risk syndromes can be used as simple and scalable methods to identify high-risk patients forworkup or for clinical trial enrichment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available