4.7 Article

Investigation of the impact and mechanisms of changes in the process evaporation rate in high efficiency exciplex-based OLEDs

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 854, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157127

Keywords

OLED; Exciplex; Emission layer evaporation rate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the fabrication of exciplex-based OLEDs with different process evaporation rates. By changing the evaporation rate of the emission layer, the maximum OLED efficiency was achieved, and the influence on surface morphology, exciton generation ability, and photon quantity was analyzed.
In this paper, exciplex-based OLEDs with the ITO/ m-MTDATA (30 nm)/ m-MTDATA:Bphen (40 nm, 1:1, x angstrom/s)/ Bphen (30 nm)/ LiF (1 nm)/ Al (80 nm) structural configuration are fabricated with different process evaporation rates. Since exciplexes are formed by combining m-MTDATA and Bphen materials, we maintained the volume ratio of these two materials at 1:1 in the emission layer to that these two different electrical types of organic molecules were evenly mixed. AFM observations, capacitance-voltage measurements, and photoluminescence spectra used to investigate the surface morphology and the exciton generation ability, and a comparison of the number of photons in the emission layer with various evaporation rates was conducted. Finally, the maximum OLED efficiency of 61.0 cd/A was obtained with minimum emission layer surface roughness and the maximum capacitance subtraction value (the difference in the maximum capacitance with the initial capacitance without an externally applied voltage) when the emission layer evaporation rate was 0.8 angstrom/s. This value was increased 4.1 times over the results in the literature. The detailed mechanisms are also investigated in this paper. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available