4.7 Article

Endotyping chronic rhinosinusitis based on olfactory cleft mucus biomarkers

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 147, Issue 5, Pages 1732-+

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.021

Keywords

Cluster analysis; translational medical research; chronic disease; patient-reported outcome measures; sinusitis; smell

Funding

  1. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders [R03 DC013651-01, R01 DC005805, K23DC014747]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease [R01 AI34698, R01 AI144364]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explored inflammatory endotypes in chronic rhinosinusitis using unsupervised cluster analysis of olfactory cleft biomarkers, identifying different inflammatory signatures and significant differences in olfactory measures across clusters. Organizing patients into clinically meaningful endotypes based solely on olfactory cleft biomarkers could help discriminate between patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and controls.
Background: Although chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is considered the most treatable form of olfactory dysfunction, there has been relatively little clinical attention focused on assessing endotypes as they pertain to olfactory loss. Objectives: The goal of this study was to explore inflammatory endotypes in CRS using an unsupervised cluster analysis of olfactory cleft (OC) biomarkers in a phenotype-free approach. Methods: Patients with CRS were prospectively recruited and psychophysical olfactory testing, Questionnaire of Olfactory Dysfunction (QOD-NS), and bilateral OC endoscopy were obtained. Mucus was collected from the OC and evaluated for 26 biomarkers using principal component analysis. Cluster analysis was performed using only OC biomarkers and differences in olfactory measures were compared across clusters. Results: A total of 198 subjects (128 with CRS and 70 controls) were evaluated. Evaluation of OC biomarkers indicated 6 principal components, explaining 69.50% of the variance, with type 2, mixed type 1/T(H)17-cell, growth factor, and neutrophil chemoattractant inflammatory signatures. A total of 10 clusters were identified that differed significantly in frequency of controls, and subjects with CRS with nasal polyps, and subjects with CRS without nasal polyps across the clusters (likelihood ratio test, chi(2)(18) = 178:64; P < .001). Olfactory measures differed significantly across clusters, including olfactory testing, QOD-NS, and OC endoscopy (P < .001 for all). Conclusions: Clustering based solely on OC biomarkers can organize patients into clinically meaningful endotypes that discriminate between subjects with CRS and controls. Validation studies are necessary to confirm these findings and further refine olfactory endotypes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available