4.7 Article

Affective and non-affective cognition in patients with bipolar disorder type I and type II in full or partial remission: Associations with familial risk

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 283, Issue -, Pages 207-215

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.074

Keywords

Bipolar disorder; Subtypes; Biomarker; Risk; Relatives; Cognition

Funding

  1. Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark
  2. Danish Council for Independent Research, Medical Sciences [DFF-4183-00570]
  3. Weimans Fund, Markedsmodningsfonden (the Market Development Fund) [2015-310]
  4. Gangstedfonden [A29594]
  5. Helsefonden [16-B-0063]
  6. Innovation Fund Denmark (the Innovation Fund, Denmark) [5164-00001B]
  7. Copenhagen Center for Health Technology (CACHET)
  8. EU H2020 ITN (EU project) [722561]
  9. Augustinusfonden [16-0083]
  10. Lundbeck Foundation [R215-2015-4121]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found no significant differences in cognitive profiles between recently diagnosed BD-I and BD-II, indicating that neither affective nor non-affective cognition are indicative of BD subtype.
Background: The upcoming conversion of the ICD-11 will subdivide patients with bipolar disorder (BD) into BD type I (BD-I) and BD type II (BD-II). This study aimed to investigate whether cognitive impairments could aid as objective cognitive biomarkers for recently diagnosed BD subtypes by comparing cognitive profiles between BD subtypes, their unaffected relatives (UR), and healthy controls (HC). Methods: The sample included 76 patients with BD-I, 149 patients with BD-II, 28 UR of patients with BD-I (UR-I), 50 UR of patients with BD-II (UR-II) and 168 HC from the Bipolar Illness Onset study, who were assessed with an extensive non-affective and affective cognitive test battery. Results: The results showed no significant differences in affective or non-affective cognition between BD-I and BD II. Compared to HC, patients with BD-I (but not BD-II) showed worse performance in verbal fluency (p = .01) and were slower at recognising fearful faces (p = .045), while patients with BD-II (but not BD-I) displayed generally poorer recognition of facial expressions (p = .02). Only UR-I showed lower performance on verbal fluency (p = .049) and aberrant affective cognition (ps?.047) compared to HC. Limitations: The potential confounding effects of medication were not explored. Conclusions: The lack of significant differences in cognitive profiles between recently diagnosed BD-I and BD-II suggests that neither affective nor non-affective cognition are indicative of BD subtype.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available