4.7 Review

Kraepelin's final views on manic-depressive Illness

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 282, Issue -, Pages 979-990

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.200

Keywords

Kraepelin; Manic-depressive insanity; History of psychiatry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In his final edition of "Introduction to Clinical Psychiatry," Emil Kraepelin provided a thorough examination of manic-depressive insanity, aligning closely with modern DSM-5 criteria. He emphasized the importance of mixed features and the constitutional/personality foundations of MDI, illustrating his points through detailed case reports. Kraepelin's view that classical psychotic symptoms and catatonic syndrome could be consistent with a diagnosis of MDI is also highlighted in his work.
At the age of 65, 8 years after finishing his last textbook edition, Emil Kraepelin completed the final edition of his Introduction to Clinical Psychiatry which included a mini-textbook for students with a 7-page section on manic-depressive insanity (MDI), a disorder he had formally proposed 22 years earlier, and a series of new detailed case histories, 9 of which examined MDI. This text distills, near the end of his life, Kraepelin's perspective of the key features of MDI. The text and case histories are here translated into English for the first time. Kraepelin's views of the symptoms and signs of melancholia and mania closely aligned to those proposed by DSM-5. He emphasized the importance both of mixed features and the constitutional/personality foundations of MDI suggesting that a particular emotional disposition is often seen both inter-episodically in affected individuals (where they fill the entire life) and in their unaffected relatives. He illustrates both these points in his case reports. His cases also made clear that for Kraepelin, classical Schneiderian psychotic symptoms and a full catatonic syndrome were consistent with a diagnosis of MDI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available