4.5 Article

High-performance non-enzymatic glucose sensors based on porous Co3O4 synthesized by coprecipitation method with the different precipitants

Journal

IONICS
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 1803-1812

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11581-021-03942-0

Keywords

Porous Co3O4; Coprecipitation; Non-enzymatic glucose sensor; Electrochemical properties

Funding

  1. Yunnan Provincial Training Programs of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61751107]
  3. Program for Innovative Research Team (in Science and Technology) in University of Yunnan Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compares the use of different precipitants in synthesizing porous Co3O4 for non-enzymatic amperometric sensors. Results show that Co3O4 synthesized using sodium oxalate as a precipitant exhibits higher sensitivity and better long-term stability compared to the one synthesized using ammonia water as a precipitant. This is attributed to the fluffy porous structure and higher specific surface area of Co3O4 synthesized with sodium oxalate, which enhances electroactive sites and improves electrolyte ion diffusion.
The glassy carbon electrode (GCE) embellished with porous Co3O4 as a non-enzymatic amperometric sensor is applied to the determination of glucose concentration. Spinel porous Co3O4 samples are synthesized by a facile coprecipitation method using sodium oxalate (SO) and ammonia water (AW) as different precipitants. The influence of the different precipitants on the morphology, structure, and catalytic performance is systematically studied. The electrochemical measurements reveal that the Co3O4 synthesized using sodium oxalate (SO) precipitant exhibits higher sensitivity of 1060.1 mu A mM(-1) cm(-2) and better long-term stability with maintain in 90% after 30 days than the Co3O4 (37.25 mu A mM(-1) cm(-2)) synthesized using ammonia water (AW) precipitant. The limit of detection for Co3O4 (using SO as precipitant)/GCE is estimated to be 0.32 mu M less than 0.51 mu M of Co3O4 (using AW as precipitant)/GCE (S/N = 3). The reason may be that theCo(3)O(4) (using SO as precipitant) has fluffy porous structure and higher specific surface area than the Co3O4 (using AW as precipitant), which can provide the large electroactive sites and improve the diffusion of electrolyte ions and reduces their diffusion resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available