4.4 Article

Water colonialism and Indigenous water justice in south-eastern Australia

Journal

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07900627.2020.1868980

Keywords

Indigenous water rights; water governance; Indigenous peoples and agriculture; Murray– Darling Basin

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [FT130101145]
  2. Australian Government Research Training Program
  3. Griffith University's Australian Rivers Institute
  4. Australian Research Council [FT130101145] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Political theorists argue that justice for cultural groups must consider socioeconomic distribution, political representation and cultural recognition. By combining this tripartite justice framework with settler colonial theory, the paper analyzes novel data sets on Aboriginal peoples' water experiences in south-eastern Australia, revealing the concept of 'water colonialism' and the need to include a fourth dimension - the socio-ecological realm - in justice theories for advancing Indigenous peoples' rights and needs.
Political theorists argue that justice for cultural groups must account for socioeconomic distribution, political representation and cultural recognition. Combining this tripartite justice framework with settler colonial theory, we analyse novel data sets relating to Aboriginal peoples' water experiences in south-eastern Australia. We construe persistent injustices as 'water colonialism', showing that the development of Australia's water resources has so far delivered little economic benefit to Aboriginal peoples, who remain marginalized from decision-making. We argue that justice theories need to encompass a fourth dimension - the vitally important socio-ecological realm - if they are to serve as conceptual resources for advancing Indigenous peoples' rights and needs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available