4.7 Article

Mechanistic Insights and Kinetic Modeling of Cellobiose Decomposition in Hot Compressed Water

Journal

ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 2203-2216

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02187

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP1096802]
  2. Science and Industry Endowment Fund [RP03-028]
  3. Australian Government
  4. Australian Research Council [DP1096802] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The decomposition of cellobiose (CB) under moderate hydrothermal conditions is studied experimentally using microtubular and pilot-scale flow reactors. The conversion of CB and formation of products, including cellobiulose, glucose, fructose, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, and 2-furfural, are quantified, accounting for more than 70% of the initial carbon. Organic acids, such as formic, succinic, glycolic, and acetic acids, are identified. The measured proton concentration increases with CB conversion up to 90% in a manner consistent with the formation of a notional acid with a yield of 0.49 +/- 0.11 mol of acid/mol of CB decomposed and pK(a) = 3.33 +/- 0.11. Slow ongoing formation of acids occurs after CB is substantially depleted (X > 90%). The rate of CB decomposition is increased only slightly in the presence of added formic acid, but the selectivity of glucose is enhanced significantly. A thermodynamically consistent kinetic model (40 reversible steps) is developed using reaction pathways, thermodynamics, and kinetics from the literature and our own molecular modeling computations. The model is validated by comparing predictions to our current experiments and other published results. Excellent agreement is obtained without parameter adjustment over the temperature range of 124-320 degrees C. Sensitivity analysis reveals the competition between proton catalyzed and uncatalyzed hydration as well as isomerization and reverse aldol condensation processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available