4.6 Article

Pricing and replenishment decisions for seasonal and nonseasonal products in a shared supply chain

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.108011

Keywords

Sharing platform; Pricing strategy; Replenishment; Channel power; Game theory

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71572033,71832001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates pricing and replenishment decisions for seasonal and nonseasonal products in a shared supply chain. Different models are proposed for the two product types. Adjustments in decisions based on dominance shifts and seasonal factors are crucial for seasonal products, while nonseasonal products are primarily influenced by the channel powers of nonplatform members.
This paper examines pricing and replenishment decisions for seasonal and nonseasonal products in a threeechelon shared supply chain. We adopt a time-varying demand function and propose two models (off-season and peak season) for seasonal products, three models for nonseasonal products based on the relative dominance of nonplatform members in the case of the complete information game, and a static Bayesian model in the case of the incomplete information game. For the seasonal products, we find that the chain members should adjust their optimal decisions based on the dominance shifts from the retailer to the factories and the change in the seasonal factor, but for nonseasonal products, the optimal decisions are related only to the channel powers of nonplatform members and not to seasons. In addition, an interesting finding is that the sharing platform's subsidy to the retailer is ineffective under the complete information game, while the subsidy enables the retailer to reduce the retail price and increase the order quantity under the incomplete information game. We also reveal the impacts of some key parameters on the shared chain members.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available