4.6 Review

Human L-asparaginase: Acquiring knowledge of its activation (Review)

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2021.5191

Keywords

acute lymphoblastic leukemia; L-asparaginase; ASRGL1; protein activation; autoprocessing; leukemia treatment

Categories

Funding

  1. Oswaldo Cruz Foundation
  2. Fundacao Araucaria
  3. FIOCRUZ
  4. FUNDACAO ARAUCARIA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

L-asparaginase enzymes have been crucial in acute lymphoblastic leukemia therapy for over 40 years by depleting plasma L-asparagine essential for leukemia cell survival. While bacterial enzymes used in therapy have severe side-effects, efforts are focused on developing a therapeutic variant of human L-asparaginase to avoid these problems.
L-asparaginase enzymes have been a vital component of acute lymphoblastic leukemia therapy for >40 years. L-asparaginase acts by depleting plasma L-asparagine, which is essential to the survival of leukemia cells. In contrast to normal cells, tumor cells cannot synthesize L-asparagine and thus depend on its external uptake for growth. Currently, three bacterial L-asparaginases are used in therapy; however, they are associated with severe side-effects related to high toxicity and immunogenicity. The introduction of human L-asparaginase-like protein 1 in acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment would avoid the problems caused by the bacterial enzymes; however, a major difficulty in the therapeutic use of the human enzyme comes from the fact that human L-asparaginase must be activated through an autoprocessing step, which is a low-efficiency process in vitro that results in reduced enzymatic activity. The present review article aimed to contribute to the understanding of the enzyme self-activation process and focuses on the efforts made for the development of a therapeutic variant of human L-asparaginase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available