4.8 Article

Highly efficient and stable planar perovskite solar cells by solution-processed tin oxide

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages 3128-3134

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ee02390h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science, research and technology of Iran
  2. Iran Nanotechnology Initiative Council
  3. Marie Sklodowska Curie fellowship, H2020 Grant [665667]
  4. European Union [291771]
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [407040-153952, 407040-153990]
  6. NRP 70 Energy Turnaround''
  7. SNF-NanoTera
  8. Swiss Federal Office of Energy (SYNERGY)
  9. King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST)
  10. SNF [407040-153952, 407040-153990]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) are one of the most promising lab-scale technologies to deliver inexpensive solar electricity. Low-temperature planar PSCs are particularly suited for large-scale manufacturing. Here, we propose a simple, solution-processed technological approach for depositing SnO2 layers. The use of these layers in planar PSCs yields a high stabilized power conversion efficiency close to 21%, exhibiting stable performance under real operating conditions for over 60 hours. In addition, this method yielded remarkable voltages of 1214 mV at a band gap of 1.62 eV (approaching the thermodynamic limit of 1.32 V) confirming the high selectivity of the solution-processed layers. PSCs aged under 1 sun illumination and maximum power point tracking showed a final PCE of 20.7% after ageing and dark storage, which is slightly higher than the original efficiency. This approach represents an advancement in the understanding of the role of electron selective layers on the efficiency and stability of PSCs. Therefore, the newly proposed approach constitutes a simple, scalable method paving the way for industrialization of perovskite solar cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available