4.7 Review

Machine Learning and Novel Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22052761

Keywords

machine learning; deep learning; AI; biomarker; Alzheimer’ s disease

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 107-2628-B-182A-002, 108-2628-B-182A-002, 109-2628-B-182A-002, 109-2314-B-039-039-MY3]
  2. National Health Research Institutes [NHRI-EX109-10816NC, NHRI-EX110-10816NC]
  3. Kaohsiung Chang Gung Me-morial Hospital [CMRPG8G1391, CMRPG8K1461]
  4. China Medical University Hospital [HHC-109-13]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the application of machine learning and novel biomarkers in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In addition to traditional Aβ and tau-related biomarkers, biomarkers related to neuronal injury, synaptic dysfunction, and neuroinflammation were explored. Machine learning combined with novel biomarkers and multiple variables may improve the sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing AD.
Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a complex and severe neurodegenerative disease that still lacks effective methods of diagnosis. The current diagnostic methods of AD rely on cognitive tests, imaging techniques and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of amyloid-beta 1-42 (A beta 42), total tau protein and hyperphosphorylated tau (p-tau). However, the available methods are expensive and relatively invasive. Artificial intelligence techniques like machine learning tools have being increasingly used in precision diagnosis. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the machine learning and novel biomarkers for the diagnosis of AD. Methods: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for reviews and trials that investigated the machine learning and novel biomarkers in diagnosis of AD. Results: In additional to A beta and tau-related biomarkers, biomarkers according to other mechanisms of AD pathology have been investigated. Neuronal injury biomarker includes neurofiliament light (NFL). Biomarkers about synaptic dysfunction and/or loss includes neurogranin, BACE1, synaptotagmin, SNAP-25, GAP-43, synaptophysin. Biomarkers about neuroinflammation includes sTREM2, and YKL-40. Besides, d-glutamate is one of coagonists at the NMDARs. Several machine learning algorithms including support vector machine, logistic regression, random forest, and naive Bayes) to build an optimal predictive model to distinguish patients with AD from healthy controls. Conclusions: Our results revealed machine learning with novel biomarkers and multiple variables may increase the sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of AD. Rapid and cost-effective HPLC for biomarkers and machine learning algorithms may assist physicians in diagnosing AD in outpatient clinics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available