4.7 Review

Humanized Mice as a Tool to Study Sepsis-More Than Meets the Eye

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22052403

Keywords

sepsis; septic shock; stem cells; humanized mice; methods; animal models

Funding

  1. Society of Critical Care Medicine
  2. Groff Foundation
  3. NIH NIGMS [1K23GM120630-01A1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Humanized mice as a model for sepsis offer unique insights into certain infectious pathogens, but current studies are relatively sparse and based on multiple different models and animals, indicating a need for further exploration and refinement.
(1) Background. Repetitive animal studies that have disappointed upon translation into clinical therapies have led to an increased appreciation of humanized mice as a remedy to the shortcomings of rodent-based models. However, their limitations have to be understood in depth. (2) Methods. This is a narrative, comprehensive review of humanized mice and sepsis literature to understand the model's benefits and shortcomings. (3) Results: Studies involving humanized models of sepsis include bacterial, viral, and protozoan etiology. Humanized mice provided several unique insights into the etiology and natural history of sepsis and are particularly useful in studying Ebola, and certain viral and protozoan infections. However, studies are relatively sparse and based on several different models of sepsis and humanized animals. (4) Conclusions. The utilization of humanized mice as a model for sepsis presents complex limitations that, once surpassed, hold some potential for the advancement of sepsis etiology and treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available