4.7 Article

Postnatal Changes of Neural Stem Cells in the Mammalian Auditory Cortex

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22041550

Keywords

auditory cortex; development; neural stem cell; neurosphere; postnatal; proliferation

Funding

  1. Veterans Affairs Merit Review Award [RX002100]
  2. Wayne State University Grants Plus Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that Nestin and Sox2 double-expressing NSCs were observed in the AC area of mice from P3 to 4M in vivo, while the number of NSCs reduced significantly with age. In vitro, the neurosphere forming capability, cell proliferation, and percentage of Nestin and Sox2 double-expressing NSCs also decreased significantly with age.
Our previous study reported neural stem cells (NSCs) in the auditory cortex (AC) of postnatal day 3 (P3) mice in vitro. It is unclear whether AC-NSCs exist in vivo. This study aims to determine the presence and changes of AC-NSCs during postnatal development and maturation both in vitro and in vivo. P3, postnatal day 14 (P14), 2-month-old (2M), and 4-month-old (4M) mouse brain tissues were fixed and cryosectioned for NSC marker immunostaining. In vitro, P3, P14, and 2M AC tissues were dissected and cultured in suspension to study NSCs. NSC proliferation was examined by EdU incorporation and cell doubling time assays in vitro. The results show that Nestin and Sox2 double expressing NSCs were observed in the AC area from P3 to 4M in vivo, in which the number of NSCs remarkably reduced with age. In vitro, the neurosphere forming capability, cell proliferation, and percentage of Nestin and Sox2 double expressing NSCs significantly diminished with age. These results suggest that AC-NSCs exist in the mouse AC area both in vitro and in vivo, and the percentage of AC-NSCs decreases during postnatal development and maturation. The results may provide important cues for the future research of the central auditory system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available