4.7 Review

Development of Antimicrobial Phototreatment Tolerance: Why the Methodology Matters

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22042224

Keywords

antimicrobial blue light; antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation; cold atmospheric plasma; pulsed light; persistence; resistance; tolerance; ultraviolet light

Funding

  1. National Science Centre [2018/30/Q/NZ7/00281]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Light-based antimicrobial therapies have been gaining attention as promising alternatives to antibiotics due to their high bactericidal activity and low risk for resistance development. However, repetitive sublethal phototreatment may lead to tolerance development, highlighting the need for better methodology to assess this phenomenon.
Due to rapidly growing antimicrobial resistance, there is an urgent need to develop alternative, non-antibiotic strategies. Recently, numerous light-based approaches, demonstrating killing efficacy regardless of microbial drug resistance, have gained wide attention and are considered some of the most promising antimicrobial modalities. These light-based therapies include five treatments for which high bactericidal activity was demonstrated using numerous in vitro and in vivo studies: antimicrobial blue light (aBL), antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation (aPDI), pulsed light (PL), cold atmospheric plasma (CAP), and ultraviolet (UV) light. Based on their multitarget activity leading to deleterious effects to numerous cell structures-i.e., cell envelopes, proteins, lipids, and genetic material-light-based treatments are considered to have a low risk for the development of tolerance and/or resistance. Nevertheless, the most recent studies indicate that repetitive sublethal phototreatment may provoke tolerance development, but there is no standard methodology for the proper evaluation of this phenomenon. The statement concerning the lack of development of resistance to these modalities seem to be justified; however, the most significant motivation for this review paper was to critically discuss existing dogma concerning the lack of tolerance development, indicating that its assessment is more complex and requires better terminology and methodology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available