4.7 Review

What, When and How to Measure-Peripheral Biomarkers in Therapy of Huntington's Disease

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22041561

Keywords

Huntington’ s disease; biomarkers; periphery; immune; therapy; microbiome; miRNA; blood

Funding

  1. National Science Centre [2015/17/D/NZ5/03443, 2015/17/N/NZ2/01916]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developing therapeutic strategies for HD requires the development of biomarkers for assessing treatment efficacy, with symptoms in peripheral tissues serving as indicators. Investigation of inflammatory proteins and immune cells in HD can provide insights into disease pathogenesis.
Among the main challenges in further advancing therapeutic strategies for Huntington's disease (HD) is the development of biomarkers which must be applied to assess the efficiency of the treatment. HD is a dreadful neurodegenerative disorder which has its source of pathogenesis in the central nervous system (CNS) but is reflected by symptoms in the periphery. Visible symptoms include motor deficits and slight changes in peripheral tissues, which can be used as hallmarks for prognosis of the course of HD, e.g., the onset of the disease symptoms. Knowing how the pathology develops in the context of whole organisms is crucial for the development of therapy which would be the most beneficial for patients, as well as for proposing appropriate biomarkers to monitor disease progression and/or efficiency of treatment. We focus here on molecular peripheral biomarkers which could be used as a measurable outcome of potential therapy. We present and discuss a list of wet biomarkers which have been proposed in recent years to measure pre- and postsymptomatic HD. Interestingly, investigation of peripheral biomarkers in HD can unravel new aspects of the disease pathogenesis. This especially refers to inflammatory proteins or specific immune cells which attract scientific attention in neurodegenerative disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available