Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 104, Issue -, Pages 584-591Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.01.044
Keywords
Cellulitis; Sex; Predisposing factors; Microbiology; Treatment; Staphylococcus aureus
Categories
Funding
- Infectious Diseases Working Group of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Sex differences in adult cellulitis were observed in terms of age of onset, medical history, diagnosis results, etc.
Objectives: Sex differences in adult cellulitis, a frequent cause of hospitalization, have not been analyzed. These differences were investigated in a large cellulitis series. Methods: This was a prospective observational study of 606 Spanish hospitalized cellulitis patients. Different comorbidities, clinical, diagnostic, and treatment data were compared between the sexes. Multiple logistic regression modeling was performed to determine the variables independently associated with sex. Results: Overall 606 adult cellulitis patients were enrolled; 314 (51. 8%) were male and 292 (48.2%) were female. Females were older (mean age 68.8 vs 58.9 years, p < 0.0001), less likely to have prior wounds (p = 0.02), and more likely to have venous insufficiency (p = 0.0002) and edema/lymphedema (p = 0.0003) than males. The location of the infection differed between the sexes (p = 0.02). Males were more likely to have positive pus cultures (p = 0.0008), the causing agent identified (p = 0.04), and higher rates of Staphylococcus aureus infection (p = 0.04) and received longer antibiotic treatment (p = 0.03). Factors independently associated with female sex in the multivariate analysis were older age (p < 0.0001), prior cellulitis (p = 0.01), presence of edema/lymphedema as the predisposing factor (p = 0.004), negative versus positive pus culture (p = 0.0002), and location of cellulitis other than in the lower extremities (p = 0.035). Conclusions: Differences between male and female patients with cellulitis were age, recurrence, presence of edema/lymphedema, positivity of pus culture, and topography of the infection. ? 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available