4.7 Article

Simulative optimization of catalyst configuration for biogas dry reforming

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 46, Issue 24, Pages 12835-12845

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.059

Keywords

Biogas; dry reforming; Catalyst configuration; Simulation; Hydrogen

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21776160]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study synthesized a Ni/MgO catalyst for biogas reforming using the wet impregnation method and optimized parameters through experimental rig and simulations. The optimal configuration was found to be a 2-zone setup with a catalyst ratio of 1:4, showing significant effects on catalytic behavior. The findings provide new insights into biogas reforming and heterogeneous catalysis reactions.
Biogas dry reforming is a promising technology for converting biomass into high-value products and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Recent improvements to biogas reforming have mainly focused on the preparation of functional catalysts; however, little attention has been paid to the effects of catalyst configuration in plug flow reactors. In this study, a Ni/MgO catalyst for biogas reforming was synthesized via the wet impregnation method. Parameters were optimized using an experimental rig and then simulations were performed using an Aspen HYSYS reaction simulator. We simulated loading the same amount of catalyst into 1, 2, 3, or 10 zones inside the reactor and compared performance parameters, including H-2 yield, CO yield, CH4 conversion, and CO2 conversion. The results of simulations showed that a 2-zone configuration with a catalyst ratio of 1:4 was optimal, with 88.2% H-2 yield, 83.5% CO yield, 96.4% CH4 conversion, and 91.7% CO2 conversion. Catalyst zone number, catalyst distribution, and catalyst zone position all had significant effects on catalytic behavior. The findings of this study provide new insights into the processes of biogas reforming and other heterogeneous catalysis reactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available