4.7 Article

Tungsten(VI) oxide supported rhodium nanoparticles: Highly active catalysts in hydrogen generation from ammonia borane

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 46, Issue 27, Pages 14259-14269

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.156

Keywords

Rhodium nanoparticles; Tungsten(VI) oxide; Ammonia borane; Catalytic hydrolysis; Hydrogen generation

Funding

  1. Dicle University, Turkey [BAP: ZGEF.18.012]
  2. Turkish Academy of Sciences, Turkey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that Rh0/WO3 (0.5% wt. Rh) catalyst shows high catalytic activity in the hydrolysis of ammonia borane, mainly attributed to its reducible nature as the support. Additionally, compared to colloidal(0) nanoparticles, Rh0/WO3 (0.5% wt. Rh) catalyst exhibits better performance in terms of activity, recyclability, and reusability.
Herein, we report the use of tungsten(VI) oxide (WO3) as support for Rh0 nanoparticles. The resulting Rh0/WO3 nanoparticles are highly active and stable catalysts in H2 generation from the hydrolysis of ammonia borane (AB). We present the results of our investigation on the particle size distribution, catalytic activity and stability of Rh0/WO3 catalysts with 0.5%, 1.0%, 2.0% wt. Rh loadings in the hydrolysis reaction. The results reveal that Rh-0/WO3 (0.5% wt. Rh) is very promising catalyst providing a turnover frequency of 749 min-1 in releasing 3.0 equivalent H2 per mole of AB from the hydrolysis at 25.0 C-circle. The high catalytic activity of Rh-0/WO3 catalyst is attributed to the reducible nature of support. The report covers the results of kinetics study as well as comparative investigation of activity, recyclability, and reusability of colloidal(0) nanoparticles and Rh-0/WO3 (0.5 % wt. Rh) catalyst in the hydrolysis reaction. (c) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available