4.1 Article

Bioequivalence study of two favipiravir tablet formulations in healthy male subjects

Publisher

DUSTRI-VERLAG DR KARL FEISTLE
DOI: 10.5414/CP203936

Keywords

favipiravir; RpPd inhibitor; bioequivalence; bioavailability; COVID-19

Funding

  1. World Medicine Pharmaceuticals, Istanbul, Turkey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to demonstrate the bioequivalence of a new favipiravir tablet formulation compared to the reference tablet formulation in healthy male subjects under fasting conditions. The results showed that the test and reference favipiravir products met the required bioequivalence criteria, and both products were well tolerated and safe.
Objective: The global pandemic called COVID-19 has dragged the world into a healthcare crisis, and favipiravir is one of the most prescribed agents against the virus so far. Favipiravir is a repurposed antiviral agent in treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and to meet the current need, pharmaceutical companies are working for manufacturing licensed generic favipiravir. For getting the marketing authorization, the bioequivalence of the generic product must be proven first. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the bioequivalence of a new favipiravir tablet formulation as compared to the reference tablet formulation in healthy male subjects under fasting conditions. Materials and methods: To prove the bioequivalence, a randomized, single oral dose, cross-over, two-period study was carried out in 30 healthy subjects under fasting conditions. Plasma favipiravir levels were quantified by using an in-house-developed high performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry detector (LC-MSD) method. Results: The 90% CIs for the test/reference geometric mean ratios of the C-max and AUC(0-tlast) were 88.02 - 103.11% and 98.19 - 102.06%, respectively. Conclusion: This single-dose study has shown that the test and reference favipiravir products met the required bioequivalence criteria. Besides, both products were well tolerated and safe.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available