4.6 Article

3D formulation of the deformable discrete element method

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nme.6666

Keywords

average stress; deformable particles; discrete element method; elastic constants; micro– macro relationships; nonlocal contact model

Funding

  1. National Science Centre [DEC-2015/19/B/ST8/03983]
  2. Australian Research Council [DP1901024707]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a 3D extension of the deformable discrete element method for studying granular material behavior, providing new possibilities in material modeling and confirming the effectiveness of the method through various tests.
This work presents a 3D extension of the deformable discrete element method (DDEM) developed previously for 2D problems. The 3D formulation employs spherical particles. The particle deformation is made up of a global and local deformation mode. The global mode is assumed to be produced by uniform stress due to the contact forces. Particle deformability yields a nonlocal contact model, in which one contact between particles is influenced by contacts with other particles. It also leads to the formation of new contacts in the particle assembly. The DDEM affects the behavior of the granular material at the macroscopic level and gives new possibilities in material modeling by the discrete element method (DEM). The new algorithm is verified on a unconfined uniaxial compression test of a cuboid specimen discretized with equal-size bonded particles aligned in a simple cubic pattern using an analytical solution. Enhanced modeling capabilities are presented by simulating cylindrical specimens discretized with a nonuniform size of bonded particles. The micro-macro relationships for elastic parameters are obtained. It is shown that the DDEM extends the range of the Poisson's ratio achievable with the DEM. Additional simulations are performed to determine the stability limits of the DDEM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available