4.7 Article

Two RuII Linkage Isomers with Distinctly Different Charge Transfer Photophysics

Journal

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages 3677-3689

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c03371

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. G3 program
  2. F.R.S-F.N.R.S. (Fonds National pour la Recherche Scientifique, Belgium) [UNO2715F, CDR J.0022.18]
  3. COST action [CM1202]
  4. WBI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ligand PHEHAT presents structural asymmetry that affects the photophysical properties of metal ion chelation, leading to different behaviors in [Ru-II(phen)2)HATPHE](2+) and [Ru-II(phen)(2)PHEHAT](2+). The latter exhibits two bright states, with the lower state being weakly or non-emissive depending on solvent and temperature. Experimental and theoretical analysis is crucial to fully understand this intriguing photophysical behavior.
The ligand PHEHAT (PHEHAT = 1,10-phenanthrolino[5,6-b]1,4,5,8,9,12-hexaazatriphenylene) presents a structural asymmetry that has a dramatic influence on the photophysical properties depending on the chelation site of the metal ion in the linkage isomers. While [Ru-II(phen()2)HATPHE](2+) behaves classically, like [Ru-II(bpy)(3)](2+), [RuII(phen)(2)PHEHAT](2+) exhibits an unusual behavior. It appears that this complex has two (MLCT)-M-3 bright states, the lower one being weakly emissive or nonemissive depending on the solvent and temperature. Different photophysical techniques involving a wide range of various temperatures and timescales are essential to analyze this difference. A full photophysical scheme is proposed based on experimental data and density functional theory calculations. While previous studies focused on high temperatures and longer timescale emission, we explore the complexes at very low temperatures and very short times in order to obtain a more complete picture of the intriguing photophysical behavior of these complexes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available