4.7 Article

A novel prediction model for the inbound passenger flow of urban rail transit

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 566, Issue -, Pages 347-363

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.02.036

Keywords

Passenger flow prediction; Urban rail systems; Wave-LSTM; Practical data

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFB1600702]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [72071015, 71701013, 71890972/71890970]
  3. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [L191024]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and Safety [RCS2021ZZ001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel Wave-LSTM model is introduced for high-precision short-term inbound passenger flow prediction, outperforming existing algorithms in terms of prediction accuracy. Empirical study demonstrates the promising approach of the hybrid model for predicting high-precision short-term inbound passenger flow.
High-precision short-term inbound passenger flow prediction is of great significance to the daily crowd management and line rescheduling in urban rail systems. Although current models have been applied to prediction, most methods need optimization to meet refined passenger flow management demand. In order to better predict the passenger flow, a novel Wave-LSTM model, based on long short-term memory network (LSTM) and wavelet, is introduced in this paper. In an empirical study with practical passenger flow data of Dongzhimen Station in the Beijing Subway system, the hybrid model exhibited more effective performance in terms of prediction accuracy than the existing algorithms, e.g., autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), nonlinear regression (NAR), and traditional LSTM model. The study illustrates that our newly adopted model is a promising approach for predicting high-precision short-term inbound passenger flow. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available