4.6 Review

Intensification of Polymerization Processes by Reactive Extrusion

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 60, Issue 7, Pages 2791-2806

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c05078

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51973193]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering [SKL-ChE-13D]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Screw extruders with unique geometry can be used as continuous reactors for polymerization reactions without using solvents, known as reactive extrusion polymerization. This intensified process maximizes reaction rates by increasing concentrations of monomers and initiators/ catalysts.
The unique geometry of screw extruders allows handling very viscous media; thus, they can be used as continuous reactors to conduct polymerization reactions without using any solvents. This is called reactive extrusion polymerization. It is an intensified process as it maximizes reaction rates upon maximizing the concentrations of monomers and an initiator/ catalyst (if there is any). It also allows conducting polymerization reactions at higher temperatures, without having to take measures to prevent solvents from evaporating or to work under pressure. However, screw extruders are not suitable for the early stage of polymerization in which the viscosity of the polymerization system may not be high enough for the rotation of the screws to generate a steady flow. A combination of continuously stirred tank reactors and a twin-screw extruder or several in series is preferred for the polymerization process. This review shows how reactive extrusion may intensify different types of polymerization processes under the constraint of no solvents, such as free-radical polymerization, anionic polymerization, ring-opening polymerization, and polycondensation, on one hand; and how challenges are met, on the other hand.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available