4.7 Article

Advanced lithium ion battery modeling and nonlinear analysis based on robust method in frequency domain: Nonlinear characterization and non-parametric modeling

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages 602-617

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.028

Keywords

Lithium battery; Random phase multisine excitation signal; Best linear approximation; Noise quantification; Nonlinear distortion; Odd-even nonlinearities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the importance of battery modeling and characterization and lack of an accurate and comprehensive method, which considers battery as a nonlinear model, this paper introduces a novel methodology for analysis in the frequency domain. This methodology looks to the battery from a different point of view and covers aspects of the battery that is often neglected in the previous work and research studies. Using periodic signals for system identification, allows separating noise and nonlinear distortions from the linear part of the system. Meanwhile random phase multisine signals are very popular as an arbitrary number of frequencies can be added together and applied to the battery at once. In addition to a shorter test time in comparison with conventional single sine EIS (electrochemical impedance spectroscopy), by performing extra periods and different phase realizations, transients are eliminated and noise disturbance and also nonlinear distortion is detected, quantified and qualified. Thanks to the statistical and averaging methods, the linear part of the system can be identified and distinguished from nonlinear noise source, which helps to improve model quality and accuracy. Furthermore this method is used for battery characterization and for evaluating the battery performance and its nonlinear behavior at different current rms values as well as at various state of charge levels. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available