4.4 Article

Efficient recurrent attention network for remote sensing scene classification

Journal

IET IMAGE PROCESSING
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 1712-1721

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1049/ipr2.12139

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scene classification for remote sensing is a popular topic, and a novel efficient deep learning model ERANet is proposed, using Efficientnet-B0 as a lightweight backbone and applying focal loss to address the sample imbalance issue, demonstrating its effectiveness through extensive experiments on challenging data sets.
Scene classification for remote sensing is a popular topic, and many recent convolutional neural networks (CNNs)-based methods have shown the great model capacity and learning ability of highly discriminative features. Given a large number of training data, CNN can extract extensive features and learn to predict a remote sensing image. However, for supervised learning tasks, deep models often rely on a large number of labelled remote sensing images, which are difficult to pre-process. Thus, training a lightweight deep learning model is essential. Easy-classified and hard samples may also cause an imbalance of training set and lead the model to overwhelm the loss function. Accordingly, a novel Efficient Recurrent Attention Network (ERANet) for remote sensing scene classification is proposed. Different from traditional deep learning methods, Efficientnet-B0 is introduced as a lightweight backbone for the ARCNet framework, replacing the original one. By applying the modified efficient backbone, the low Floating Point Operations (FLOPs) and parameter numbers of the proposed ERANet are maintained. The significance of focal loss is determined and applied to address the sample imbalance problem and yield a desirable performance. Extensive experiments on several challenging remote sensing scene classification data sets prove the efficiency of the proposed ERANet.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available