4.7 Article

Emissions reduction allocation and economic welfare estimation through interregional emissions trading in China: Evidence from efficiency and equity

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 113, Issue -, Pages 1125-1135

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.113

Keywords

Shapley value method; Emissions reduction allocation; Emissions trading scheme; Economic welfare; Equity; Efficiency

Funding

  1. Philosophy, Society and Science Planning Foundation of Zhejiang Province [15NDJC123YB]
  2. Humanities and Social Sciences Planning Foundation of the Ministry of Education [14YJC790007]
  3. Post doctor Science Foundation of China [2016M590432]
  4. Planning Project of the Collaborative Innovation Center of Local Finance in Zhejiang University of Finance Economics
  5. Statistical Research Planning Foundation of Zhejiang Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Establishing an equal and effective emissions trading system is a long-term strategy to promote sustainable environmental protection and stronger economic growth. Due to regional divergences in economic development, resource endowment and geographical CO2 emissions space, this paper focuses on a comprehensive emissions reduction allocation solution based on the Shapley value method and estimating economic welfare effects through interregional emissions trading in China. Our empirical results verify that the Shapley value-based allocation criterion is an equal and effective emissions reduction target allocation. The Eastern and Southern coast, and the Northeastern and Middle Yellow River regions are the main emissions permit buyers, and they incur windfall economic losses because of greater marginal abatement cost, while the Southwest, Northwest, Northern coast and Middle Yangtze River regions are the main emissions permit sellers, and they earn windfall economic benefits because of the emissions reduction potential of energy-intensive industries. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available