4.8 Article

Three-Phase LLC Battery Charger: Wide Regulation and Improved Light-Load Operation

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 1519-1531

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2020.3006422

Keywords

Battery charger; dead battery; extended gain range; light-load; phase-shedding; recovery charging; three-phase LLC

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article investigates the unique features and issues of three-phase LLC resonant converters, proposing a new phase-shedding strategy to achieve a wider gain range and improve charging efficiency under light loads.
Three-phase LLC resonant converters can handle much higher power compared to half-bridge and full-bridge LLC converters, which makes them suitable for levels 2 and 3 battery charger applications. In addition to the unique features of LLC resonant converters, the three-phase structure provides higher power capacity and higher power density at higher power levels in comparison with single-phase structures. Although single-phase LLC resonant converters were thoroughly investigated in the literature for many different applications, limited work has been done on three-phase LLC converters. Unexplored problems with three-phase LLC resonant converters include issues with their limited gain range and also their poor light-load efficiency. In this article, a modified three-phase LLC resonant converter with a new phase-shedding strategy is proposed. With the proposed modified topology and phase-shedding strategy, the wide gain range needed for covering the recovery zone of charging Li-ion batteries is realized. Moreover, with the proposed phase-shedding strategy, a significant efficiency improvement with light-load absorption charging is achieved. A 3-kW prototype was developed to validate the performance of the proposed converter.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available