Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Differences in Re-excision Rates for Breast-Conserving Surgery Using Intraoperative 2D Versus 3D Tomosynthesis Specimen Radiograph
Natalia Partain et al.
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY (2020)
Simulation of high-resolution test objects using non-isocentric acquisition geometries in next-generation digital tomosynthesis
Trevor L. Vent et al.
15TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON BREAST IMAGING (IWBI2020) (2020)
Simulation and Experimental Validation of High-Resolution Test Objects for Evaluating a Next-Generation Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Prototype
Trevor L. Vent et al.
MEDICAL IMAGING 2019: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING (2019)
Evaluating the imaging performance of a next-generation digital breast tomosynthesis prototype
Trevor L. Vent et al.
MEDICAL IMAGING 2019: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING (2019)
Novel direct conversion imaging detector without selenium or semiconductor conversion layer
Denny L. Lee et al.
MEDICAL IMAGING 2019: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING (2019)
Analysis of Volume Overestimation Artifacts in the Breast Outline Segmentation in Tomosynthesis
Raymond J. Acciavatti et al.
MEDICAL IMAGING 2018: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING (2018)
Geometric Calibration for a Next-Generation Digital Breast Tomosynthesis system Using Virtual Line Segments
Chloe J. Choi et al.
MEDICAL IMAGING 2018: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING (2018)
Oblique reconstructions in tomosynthesis. II. Super-resolution
Raymond J. Acciavatti et al.
MEDICAL PHYSICS (2013)
Observation of super-resolution in digital breast tomosynthesis
Raymond J. Acciavatti et al.
MEDICAL PHYSICS (2012)
Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response
Andrew Kuhls-Gilcrist et al.
MEDICAL PHYSICS (2010)
Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis
Bo Zhao et al.
MEDICAL PHYSICS (2009)
Normalization of the modulation transfer function: The open-field approach
S. N. Friedman et al.
MEDICAL PHYSICS (2008)
Share Paper
