4.4 Article

Anisotropic Heatsinks for Heat-Assisted Magnetic Recording

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2020.3019802

Keywords

Heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR); magnetic media; thermal design

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study explores the relevance of anisotropic heatsinks for HAMR, finding that their performance is determined by in-plane thermal conductivity. TDTR measurements extracted the thermal conductivities of a (Cu/Ta) multilayer heatsink, demonstrating its potential as a candidate for HAMR with high in-plane thermal conductivity.
The relevance of anisotropic heatsinks for heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) is investigated. First, 3-D thermal modeling is used to demonstrate that the heatsink performance on a glass substrate is determined by the heatsink in-plane thermal conductivity. The out-of-plane thermal conductivity has almost no impact on the heatsink ability to carry heat away from the hot spot. As a result, an anisotropic heatsink can be a good alternative to some conventional isotropic heatsink materials when its in-plane thermal conductivity is larger than that of the isotropic material. Second, time-domain thermo-reflectance (TDTR) measurements are presented to extract both the in-plane and the out-of-plane thermal conductivities of a (Cu/Ta) multilayer heatsink. The sensitivity to in-plane thermal conductivity is achieved by using small laser beam sizes and by combining measurements at multiple modulation frequencies on both a low and a high thermally conductive substrate. The fitting of all TDTR spectra gives for the (Cu[5.1]/Ta[1.4]) multilayers an effective out-of-plane thermal conductivity of 11.5 W/mK and an in-plane thermal conductivity of 69 W/mK. These thermal properties make such multilayer material an interesting candidate as HAMR heatsink, equivalent to a 70 W/mK isotropic

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available