4.6 Article

Hole Redistribution Model Explaining the Thermally Activated RON Stress/Recovery Transients in Carbon-Doped AlGaN/GaN Power MIS-HEMTs

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages 697-703

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TED.2020.3045683

Keywords

Current collapse; GaN metal-insulator-semiconductor high electron mobility transistors (MIS-HEMT); hole redistribution; OFF-state stress; ON-resistance degradation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By conducting 2-D device simulations on carbon-doped AlGaN/GaN power MIS-HEMTs, it is discovered that the changes in R-ON during stress and recovery experiments can be explained by a model based on hole redistribution. The limited hole emission by carbon-related acceptors at an energy level of about 0.9 eV is found to be the key factor affecting both degradation and recovery processes.
R-ON degradation due to stress in GaN-based power devices is a critical issue that limits, among other effects, long-term stable operation. Here, by means of 2-D device simulations, we show that the R-ON increase and decrease during stress and recovery experiments in carbon-doped AlGaN/GaN power metal-insulator-semiconductor high electron mobility transistors (MIS-HEMTs) can be explained with a model based on the emission, redistribution, and retrapping of holes within the carbon-doped buffer (hole redistribution in short). By comparing simulation results with front- and back-gating OFF-state stress experiments, we provide an explanation for the puzzling observation of both stress and recovery transients being thermally activated with the same activation energy of about 0.9 eV. This finds a straightforward justification in a model in which both R-ON degradation and recovery processes are limited by hole emission by dominant carbon-related acceptors that are energetically located at about 0.9 eV from the GaN valence band.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available