4.7 Article

Experimental and modeling investigation of an ICE (internal combustion engine) based micro-cogeneration device considering overheat protection controls

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 101, Issue -, Pages 447-461

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.030

Keywords

Micro-cogeneration; Dynamic simulation model; internal combustion engine; Overhear protection control

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [5151101162]
  2. Walt Disney Company (Shanghai) Limited [3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A dynamic simulation model for the micro-cogeneration unit based on ICE (internal combustion engine) is built as a new component on TRNSYS. This model considers dynamic processes including start-up, cool-down, and overheat protection controls. Through an experiment study, the steady and dynamic performances of the unit are presented and analyzed for calibrating the parameters of the dynamic model. Then the model is validated by the experiment data during steady and dynamic processes. The improvement of prediction accuracy of the model by considering dynamic processes is analyzed. The validation results show that the dynamic model can well predict the characteristics of the unit during start-up, cool-down, and overheat protection control processes. The cumulative prediction errors of the dynamic model decrease with the increase of the start stop interval. By considering the dynamic processes, 5.18% and 3.2% of Qth and eta(total) cumulative prediction errors are decreased respectively when the start stop interval is 0.5 h. The primary energy saving ratio and CO2 emission reduction ratio increases with the increase of the start stop interval. The start stop interval for the unit in this paper should be longer than 0.5 h, or the energy consumption of micro-cogeneration unit would be larger than that of conventional system. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available