4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Age at maturation predicted from scale measurements in Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii)

Journal

ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 78, Issue 2, Pages 704-713

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsaa241

Keywords

age at maturation; Clupea pallasii; growth; maturity; Pacific herring; scales; Sitka Sound

Funding

  1. North Pacific Research Board [1708]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study attempted to estimate maturity of Pacific herring using scale growth, but the method was found to be ineffective. There were no significant differences in growth or scale measurements between immature and mature female herring, possibly due to the small sample size or differences in growth being better represented by length-specific mass changes.
Age at maturation is linked to population productivity and directly impacts forecasts of population biomass and resultant harvest limits set by management agencies. Based on the original concept that scale growth can be used as an index of body growth (length) from Johan Hjort and his collaborators, the current study examined a new way of estimating maturity empirically using scales for Pacific herring. We hypothesized that Pacific herring that will spawn in a particular year (spring) will have reached a sufficient size and have reduced growth (length) the summer prior, compared to immature herring, as energy will be allocated to reproduction rather than somatic length. Model results suggested that there was no difference in the measurement of all scale growth prior to the last increment (growth up until the summer prior) nor in the outer ring measurement (growth the summer prior to spawning) of immature and mature female herring; using scales to estimate maturity empirically was not successful in this study. It is possible that the sample size in this study may have been too low to detect differences in growth or differences in growth may be better represented by changes in length-specific mass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available