Venus' upper atmosphere revealed by a GCM: I. Structure and variability of the circulation

A numerical simulation of the upper atmosphere of Venus is carried out with an improved version of the Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace (IPSL) full-physics Venus General Circulation Model (GCM). This simulation reveals the organization of the atmospheric circulation at an altitude above 80 km in unprecedented detail. Converging flow towards the antisolar point results in supersonic wind speeds and generates a shock-like feature past the terminator at altitudes above 110 km. This shock-like feature greatly decreases nightside thermospheric wind speeds, favoring atmospheric variability on a hourly timescale in the nightside of the thermosphere. A similar to 5-day period Kelvin wave originating in the cloud deck is found to substantially impact the Venusian upper atmosphere circulation. As the Kelvin wave impacts the nightside, the poleward meridional circulation is enhanced. Consequently, recombined molecular oxygen is periodically ejected to high latitudes, explaining the characteristics of the various observations of oxygen nightglow at 1.27 mu m. An analysis of the simulated 1.27 mu m oxygen nightglow shows that it is not necessarily a good tracer of the upper atmospheric dynamics, since contributions from chemical processes and vertical transport often prevail over horizontal transport. Moreover, dayside atomic oxygen abundances also vary periodically as the Kelvin wave momentarily decreases horizontal wind speeds and enhances atomic oxygen abundances, explaining the observations of EUV oxygen dayglow. Despite the nitrogen chemistry not being currently included in the IPSL Venus GCM, the apparent maximum NO nightglow shifted towards the morning terminator might be explained by the simulated structure of winds.

Automated summary

A numerical simulation of Venus' upper atmosphere reveals detailed atmospheric circulation and the impact of a Kelvin wave, as well as how nightside oxygen nightglow and dayside oxygen dayglow are influenced by atmospheric dynamics. Despite nitrogen chemistry not being included, simulated wind structures may explain the observed NO nightglow shift.