4.5 Article

Boulder sizes and shapes on asteroids: A comparative study of Eros, Itokawa and Ryugu

Journal

ICARUS
Volume 357, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2020.114282

Keywords

Asteroids; Surfaces; Asteroid Eros; Asteroid Itokawa; Asteroid Ryugu; Regoliths

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [20K04048]
  2. Hypervelocity Impact Facility, ISAS, JAXA
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20K04048] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study provides a consistent and coherent model of boulder size distributions on asteroids Eros, Itokawa, and Ryugu. By remeasuring boulders and combining observations, the power-indices of the boulder size distributions were derived, with Ryugu having the highest density of boulders. Additionally, the study notes that boulder appearance tends towards elongation on smaller asteroids.
In order to understand the geological evolution of asteroids Eros, Itokawa and Ryugu and their collisional history, previous studies investigated boulder size distributions on their surfaces. However, quantitative comparison of these size distributions is hampered by numerous differences between these studies regarding the definition of a boulder's size, measuring technique and the fitting method to determine the power-index of the boulder size distributions. We provide a consistent and coherent model of boulder size distributions by remeasuring the boulders on the entire surfaces of Eros and Itokawa using the Small Body Mapping Tool (SBMT) and combining our observations with the Ryugu data of Michikami et al. (2019). We derived power-indices of the boulder size distributions of -3.25 +/- 0.14 for Eros, -3.05 +/- 0.14 for Itokawa and -2.65 +/- 0.05 for Ryugu. The asteroid with the highest number density of boulders >= 5 m turns out to be Ryugu, not Itokawa, as suggested by an earlier study. We show that the appearance of the boulders tends towards more elongated shapes as the size of an asteroid decreases, which can be explained by differences in asteroid gravity and boulder friction angles. Our quantitative observational results indicate that boulder migration preferentially affects smaller boulders, and tends to occur on larger asteroids.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available