4.7 Article

Life cycle energy and CO2 emission optimization for biofuel supply chain planning under uncertainties

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 103, Issue -, Pages 151-166

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.151

Keywords

Life cycle; Biofuel supply chain; Uncertainty; Interval number; Programming

Funding

  1. International Network Programme - Styrelsen for Forskning og Innovation [95-460-54298]
  2. Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of NUIST [2015r003]
  3. Shanghai Key Lab for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration [UES2015A04]
  4. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [71325006]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71403163, 21176270, 51272296, 71472021, 71461137008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this paper is to develop a model for the decision-makers/stakeholders to design biofuel supply chain under uncertainties. Life cycle energy and CO2 emission of biofuel supply chain are employed as the objective functions, multiple feedstocks, multiple transportation modes, multiple sites for building biofuel plants, multiple technologies for biofuel production, and multiple markets for biofuel distribution are considered, and the amount of feedstocks in agricultural system, transportation capacities, yields of crops, and market demands are considered as uncertainty variables in this study. A biobjective interval mix integer programming model has been developed for biofuel supply chain design under uncertainties, and the bio-objective interval programming method has been developed to solve this model. An illustrative case of a multiple-feedstock-bioethanol system has been studied by the proposed method, and the results show that the proposed model can help decision-makers/stakeholders plan and design the biofuel supply chain by proposing feasible solutions to them. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available