4.3 Article

Inclusion of People With Peripheral Artery Disease in Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs: A Pan-Canadian Survey

Journal

HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION
Volume 30, Issue 7, Pages 1031-1043

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.12.018

Keywords

Peripheral artery disease; Cardiac rehabilitation; Coronary artery disease; Secondary prevention; Cardiovascular rehabilitation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The majority of cardiac rehabilitation programs in Canada accept referrals for individuals with peripheral artery disease, but actual participation rates are low, with barriers including lack of referrals and program capacity constraints. Facilitators for participation include providing information on benefits of CRPs to referral sources and patients, PAD-specific education for staff, and PAD-toolkits for prescribing aerobic/resistance training.
Purpose To determine the proportion of cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRPs) in Canada that accept referrals for individuals with peripheral artery disease (PAD), eligibility criteria, and barriers/facilitators to inclusion. Methods CRPs across Canada were sent a web-based questionnaire. Results Of 180 questionnaires sent, 98 CRP managers representing 114 CRPs (62.6% of CRPs in Canada) responded. Of respondents, 81.6% accepted referrals for people with PAD; however 44.6% reported that <10 patients participated in the previous calendar year; two CRPs had no participants. Of CRPs accepting PAD, 23.7% accepted patients only with coexisting cardiac disease, 68.4% accepted post-lower limb amputees with prosthesis and 53.9% without prosthesis (non-ambulatory). Further, 32.2% did not provide formal/ informal PAD-specific education to patients and only 14.3% provided education to staff regarding PAD in the previous 3 years. Three (3) numerical pain scales were used to guide exercise intensity. Within these scales up to four pain thresholds were used. Most frequently cited barriers to participation included lack of referrals (61.6%), and programs being at capacity (59.3%). Frequently cited facilitators were providing information on benefits of CRPs to referral sources (88.3%) and patients (88.3%), providing PAD-specific education to staff (85.5%), and PAD-toolkits for prescribing aerobic/resistance training (81.5%, both). Conclusion Most CRPs accept individuals with PAD, however, few are referred. Inclusion of PAD with and without cardiac disease, collaboration between referral source and CRPs to improve the referral process, and PAD-specific education for staff and information/brochures on benefits of CRPs for patients and referral sources should improve participation and delivery of secondary prevention strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available