4.4 Review

Does community-based health insurance improve access to care in sub-Saharan Africa? A rapid review

Journal

HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages 572-584

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czaa174

Keywords

Health insurance; community-based health insurance; community financing; healthcare access; health financing; health systems; healthcare utilization; sub-Saharan Africa; developing countries

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Community-based health insurance programs in sub-Saharan African countries can improve access to outpatient care, but have limited impact on access to inpatient care and equity among insured members. Rigorous studies are needed to validate and further develop these findings.
In sub-Saharan African countries, out-of-pocket payments can be a major barrier to accessing appropriate healthcare services. Community-based health insurance (CBHI) has emerged as a context-appropriate risk-pooling mechanism to provide some financial protection to populations without access to formal health insurance. The aim of this rapid review was to examine the peer-reviewed literature on the impact of CBHI on the use of healthcare services as well as its capacity to improve equity in the use of healthcare between different socio-economic groups. A systematic search of three electronic databases (Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Litterature en Sante) was performed. Data were extracted on scheme and study characteristics, as well as the impact of the schemes on relevant outcomes. Sixteen publications met the inclusion criteria, studying schemes from seven different countries. They provide strong evidence that community-based health insurance can contribute to improving access to outpatient care and weak evidence that they improve access to inpatient care. There was low evidence on their capacity to improve equity in access to healthcare among insured members. In the absence of sufficient public spending for healthcare, such schemes may be able to provide some valuable benefits for communities with limited access to primary-level care in sub-Saharan Africa. The overall high risk of bias of the studies and the wide existing variety of insurance arrangements suggest caution in generalizing these results. These findings need to be validated and further developed by rigorous studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available