4.7 Article

Where Are Global Vegetation Greening and Browning Trends Significant?

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020GL091496

Keywords

Global Greening; Leaf Area Index (LAI); Multiple Testing; Statistical significance

Funding

  1. NASA Earth Science Division
  2. Free State of Thuringia
  3. International Max Planck Research School for Global Biogeochemical Cycles (IMPRS-gBGC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Global greening trends have been reanalyzed using a novel statistical method to address issues of multiple hypothesis testing and false positive detection. The study found a reduction in detected greening from 35.2% to 15.3% of terrestrial land surface, with the most significant decrease observed in nonwoody vegetation. The results confirm several greening regions and suggest an increasing seasonal amplitude in leaf area index north of 35 degrees N.
Global greening trends have been widely reported based on long-term remote sensing data of terrestrial ecosystems. Typically, a hypothesis test is performed for each grid cell; this leads to multiple hypothesis testing and false positive trend detection. We reanalyze global greening and account for this issue with a novel statistical method that allows robust inference on greening regions. Based on leaf area index (LAI) data, our methods reduce the detected greening from 35.2% to 15.3% of the terrestrial land surface; this reduction is most notable in nonwoody vegetation. Our results confirm several greening regions (China, India, Europe, Sahel, North America, Brazil, and Siberia), that are also supported by independent data products. We also report evidence for an increasing seasonal amplitude in LAI north of 35 degrees N. Considering the widespread use of spatially replicated trend tests in global change research, we recommend adopting the proposed multiple testing procedure to control false positive outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available