4.7 Article

A Multiyear Constraint on Ammonia Emissions and Deposition Within the US Corn Belt

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020GL090865

Keywords

agriculture; ammonia emissions; deposition; forests; mitigation; reactive nitrogen; tall tower; US Corn Belt; WRF‐ Chem modeling

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1640337]
  2. United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA NIFA) [2018-67019-27808]
  3. USDA Agricultural Research Service
  4. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research Program, through Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Terrestrial Ecosystem Science Scientific Focus Area
  5. US DOE [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  6. Minnesota Supercomputing Institute for Advanced Computational Research
  7. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  8. Directorate For Geosciences [1640337] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that NH3 emissions in the US Corn Belt peaked in summer, with agricultural NH3 emissions showing little variation across years but exhibiting significant episodic variability influenced by meteorology and land management. Dry deposition accounted for 40% of total emissions from agricultural lands and exceeded 100% in natural lands.
The US Corn Belt is a global hotspot of atmospheric ammonia (NH3), a gas known to adversely impact the environment and human health. We combine hourly tall tower (100 m) measurements and bi-weekly, spatially distributed, ground-based observations from the Ammonia Monitoring Network with the US National Emissions Inventory (NEI) and WRF-Chem simulations to constrain NH3 emissions from April to September 2017-2019. We show that: (1) NH3 emissions peaked from May to July and were 1.6-1.7 times the annual NEI average; (2) average growing season NH3 emissions from agricultural lands were remarkably similar across years (3.27-3.64 nmol m(-2) s(-1)), yet showed substantial episodic variability driven by meteorology and land management; (3) dry deposition was 40% of gross emissions from agricultural lands and exceeded 100% of gross emissions in natural lands. Our findings provide an important benchmark for evaluating future NH3 emissions and mitigation efforts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available