4.6 Article

Logjam attenuation of annual sediment waves in eolian-fluvial environments, North Park, Colorado, USA

Journal

GEOMORPHOLOGY
Volume 375, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107494

Keywords

Sediment wave; OHV impact; Eolian-fluvial interaction; Large wood

Funding

  1. State Line Ranch

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates sediment waves in North Sand Creek and East Sand Creek in North Park, Colorado. The results show that North Sand Creek experiences a translative sediment wave attenuated by logjams, while East Sand Creek does not undergo sediment wave.
Sediment waves, a term that describes the fluvial transport of a discrete sediment influx, have been studied in regard to channel response to infrequent catastrophic events, such as mass movements or dam removal. However, few researchers have studied (1) the potential presence of sediment waves of annual or sub-annual scale in mixed eolian-fluvial geomorphic environments or (2) the role of large wood in sediment wave dispersal. This study addresses both topics through observations of North Sand Creek and East Sand Creek, which flow alongside the active sand dunes of North Sand Hills and East Sand Hills, respectively, in North Park, Colorado. The creeks experience similar seasonal, asynchronous cycles of eolian influx and fluvial transport, although North Sand Creek receives a greater volume of eolian sand. We use repeat photography and repeat measurement of ephemeral terraces to determine whether each creek experiences a sediment wave, and we use repeat measurement of logjam sand wedge volume to examine changes in sand storage associated with logjams over time. Results indicate that North Sand Creek experiences a highly translative sediment wave that is attenuated by logjams. East Sand Creek, on the other hand, does not experience a sediment wave. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available