4.7 Article

Wet torrefaction of bamboo saw dust and its co-pyrolysis with plastic

Journal

FUEL
Volume 285, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119188

Keywords

Bamboo saw dust; Wet torrefaction; Xylose selective production; Linear low-density polyethylene; Co-pyrolysis; Criado's master plot

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi, India under the special scheme Clean Energy Research Initiative (CERI) [DST/TM/CERI/C19(G)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, bamboo saw dust was wet-torrefied to remove hemicellulose and produce hydrochar with high energy density. Thermogravimetric analysis showed that the blend of hydrochar and LLDPE exhibited the highest positive synergism during co-pyrolysis at a specific heating rate.
In this study, the bamboo saw dust (BSD) was wet-torrefied (WT) to selectively remove hemicellulose in the form of pentoses (xylose + arabinose) with 85% yield and to produce hydrochar (with the high energy density of 24 MJ/kg, which is similar to that of lignite). Further, the pyrolysis and co-pyrolysis behavior of hydrochar, LLDPE, and their blends were analyzed by thermogravimetric analysis in the temperature range of 30-800 degrees C and under argon atmosphere. The blend with one part hydrochar and three parts LLDPE (TBP1:3) showed the highest positive synergism during co-pyrolysis at a 40 degrees C min 1 heating rate. The average apparent activation energies (as calculated using isoconversional methods) of co-pyrolysis of blended samples (TBP3:1, TBP1:1, and TBP1:3) were found to be 232, 261, 247 kJ mol(-1), respectively. The Criado's master plot showed the reaction mechanism of co-pyrolysis to be multistep. For example, the blend TBP1:3 followed the trend of two-dimensional Avrami-Erofeyev model (A2) at lower conversions, diffusion-reaction model (D2) at high conversions and end with a first-order reaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available