4.7 Article

THIP: A new TPRF-like fuel surrogate development approach to better match real fuel properties

Journal

FUEL
Volume 286, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119395

Keywords

RON; MON; Surrogate gasoline; Modelling; IDT; DVPE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduces a three-component surrogate formulation, THIP, based on toluene, n-heptane, and isopentane, which can effectively simulate the RON and MON of actual gasoline, while also better matching density, distillation properties, and other volatility parameters. THIP surrogates can fully cover EN228 Summer and Winter gasoline specifications and exhibit excellent matching between ignition delay time and temperature.
Simple surrogate formulations for gasoline are useful for modelling purposes and for comparing experimental results using a carefully designed fuel. Simple three component surrogate fuels based on toluene, n-heptane and isooctane, called toluene primary reference fuels (TPRF), are frequently used to match the RON and MON of actual gasoline fuels. In this work the main advantages of using an alternative three-component surrogate formulation, based on toluene, n-heptane and isopentane (THIP) are presented. Given a reference gasoline, good representations of RON and MON are achieved as well as better matching density, distillation properties and other volatility parameters associated with the lighter end of gasoline fuels. In particular, THIP surrogates can replicate Dry Vapour Pressure Equivalent (DVPE) values ranging from 10.4 kPa to 138.9 kPa, fully covering the EN228 Summer and Winter gasoline specifications. Moreover, Rapid Compression Machine (RCM) results demonstrate that THIP surrogates can reproduce the essential characteristics of the reference gasoline in terms of ignition delay time versus temperature. An existing chemical kinetic mechanism is shown to be able represent THIP surrogate well.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available