4.5 Article

Environment-Friendly Heterogeneous Alkaline-Based Mixed Metal Oxide Catalysts for Biodiesel Production

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en9080611

Keywords

biodiesel; transesterification; non-edible oil; mixed metal oxides; solid catalyst

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Malaya
  2. University Malaya Research Grant (UMRG) [RP0225A/B-14AET/RP022A-13AET]
  3. MOE [FP054-2013B]
  4. [GC001B-14AET]
  5. [SATU: RU021A-2015/RU020A-2015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The critical problem arising from the depletion of fossil fuels has stimulated recent interests in alternative sources for petroleum-based fuel. An alternative fuel should be technically feasible, readily available, sustainable, and techno-economically competitive. Biodiesel is considered as a potential replacement of conventional diesel fuel, which is prepared from non-edible and high-acid feedstock via transesterification technology. The focus of this study is to investigate the catalytic activity of mixed metal oxides (MMOs) as catalysts for biodiesel production by using non-edible jatropha oil as feedstock. Various types of MMOs (CaO-MgO, CaO-ZnO, CaO-La2O3, and MgO-ZnO) were synthesized via a co-precipitation method. In this study, transesterification activities are closely related to the physicochemical properties of catalysts. The presence of different active metals in the binary system greatly influenced the surface area, basicity, and the stability of catalysts. The catalytic activity of MMO catalysts was increased in the order of CaO-ZnO (94% +/- 1%) > CaO similar to CaO-MgO similar to CaO-La2O3 (similar to 90% +/- 2%) > MgO-ZnO (83% +/- 2%) > MgO (64% +/- 1%) > ZnO (41% +/- 2%) > La2O3 (23% +/- 1%). In addition, the MMO catalysts, especially CaO-ZnO, demonstrated high reusability and catalyst stability for four cycles of transesterification reaction of jatropha oil.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available