4.7 Article

Modelling of 3D viscous fingering: Influence of the mesh on coreflood experiments

Journal

FUEL
Volume 287, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119441

Keywords

Viscous Fingering; CFD; 3D; Mesh analysis; Heavy oil; Coreflood

Funding

  1. Frontera Energy, Colombia
  2. Frontera Energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study simulated 3D coreflood experiments using CFD and compared the performance of different mesh types. The CFD model based on the VOF model and porous media model was validated against experimental data for oil recovery profile. The study concluded that unstructured polyhedral and structured hexahedral meshes provided the most reliable description of the phenomenon.
The modeling of Viscous Fingering (VF) is of interest to the study of multiphase flow in porous media, especially in the O&G industry, where this phenomenon is one of the root causes of high-water production and low sweep efficiency. In this study, 3D coreflood experiments found in the literature were simulated with CFD, and nine different structured and unstructured meshes were compared to determine which one gives the best description of this phenomenon. The meshes included the structured orthogonal mesh, commonly used in reservoir simulation, up to unstructured hexahedral, polyhedral, and tetrahedral meshes, among others. On the other hand, the CFD model, which was based on the Volume of Fluid (VOF) model and the porous media model, was validated against experimental data for the oil recovery profile with an absolute error below 7% for the best cases. It was found that VF is severely affected by the type of mesh and the Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy (CFL) number used. It was concluded that the unstructured polyhedral and structured hexahedral meshes gave the most reliable description of the finger growth dynamics and oil recovery compared to experimental data. Finally, a mesh independence test using the Grid Convergence Index (GCI) methodology, along with a CFL number analysis, allowed to determine that the modeling of this phenomenon should be made using an average CFL number of 0.25.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available